1.Most notes taken did not follow the way suggested- this will ensure you always refer to the impact on the macro and keep your sentences precis

2. Lack of terminology- protagonost/antagonist/vermisilitue/realism/diegesis/diegetic/connotations/editing

3. Too much waffling

4. Too long opening paragraphs outlining what were going to do;waste of time

5. Many opening paragraphs did not state if the representations were stereotypical

6. Not enough specific examples from the extract

7. Too much discussion about how immigrants are treated in society- great to refer o this but only very briefly

8. Arguments were not strong enough as the impact on the macro was often forgotten- how did each example you're offering create meaning- audience, genre, narrative, representation

9.Hardly any reference to Binary oppositions, Todorov's narrative theory

10.Balance between micro elements were no where even

11.Limited reference to the revision session and terminology we did the lesson before the exam

12.Not all micro covered as evenly as they could have been- limited editing analysis (should have considered what we did during the revision lesson)